Every soft insurance market raises the inevitable question for risk managers: Why do I need an alternative risk-transfer vehicle when I can easily get coverage in the standard market? But to even ask
DebugScreen: mobile
{
"author": {
"name": "Kristina Dittmer",
"webUrl": "/author/profile/kristina-dittmer/",
"description": "",
"imageLarge": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/f16d6fc2845f417ea0e93a3f2b6cd37d?s=136&d=mm&r=g",
"estimate": 1,
"social": [],
"articles": [
{
"uri": "/2008/03/02/art-still-makes-sense-in-a-soft-market/",
"title": "ART Still Makes Sense In A Soft Market",
"byline": "Kristina Dittmer",
"kicker": "",
"prettyDate": "March 02, 2008",
"timeToRead": "5 minute",
"image": {
"uri": "",
"width": "",
"height": ""
},
"authors": [
{
"webUrl": "/author/profile/kristina-dittmer/",
"name": "Kristina Dittmer"
}
],
"kickerNode": [],
"summary": "Every soft insurance market raises the inevitable question for risk managers: Why do I need an alternative risk-transfer vehicle when I can easily get coverage in the standard market? But to even ask",
"body": null
}
]
}
}