Search Results

"A plain reading of the policy provides that the parties intended to exclude coverage for COVID-19 related losses like the losses plaintiff allegedly suffered in the immediate case," the court said.

The justices of the Supreme Court of Rhode Island had to decide whether the policy definition of "pollutant" was ambiguous.

The opinion links two other recent Supreme Court decisions that have set precedent in resolving disputes over D&O insurance coverage, all clarifying the role Delaware laws play in those contracts.

The court found that the COVID-19 government shutdown order does not constitute a 'direct physical loss.'

Publix said it is facing millions of dollars in legal fees because of its insurance providers' refusal to provide coverage in opioid litigation.

Here's a look inside the November/December issue of NU Property & Casualty magazine.

Huntington Ingalls, according to the Supreme Court of Vermont, suffered "direct physical damage" because employees infected with COVID had been physically present at the facilities and unintentionally spread the virus to employees who were not ill.

A key issue raised had to do with whether damages were consequential or direct — something not well defined in Texas caselaw.