X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The circuit court agreed with the district court that there were sufficient facts to find that “Charter Oak did not simply fail to disclose the existence of $900,000 of UIM coverage available to [Ms.] Dziadek, but actively deceived [Ms.] Dziadek and her attorney into believing that there was no such coverage.”

This story is reprinted with permission from FC&S Legal, the industry’s only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.

PropertyCasualty360

Join PropertyCasualty360

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed decisions for your P&C insurance business. Join PropertyCasualty360.com now!

  • Unlimited access to PropertyCasualty360.com - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including BenefitsPRO.com, ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
  • Exclusive discounts on PropertyCasualty360, National Underwriter, Claims and ALM events

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join PropertyCasualty360

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.