Does an insurer have an obligation to pay a judgment against its insured, if the underlying trial is not fully adversarial? See what the Texas Supreme Court had to say.

An appellate court in Arizona has reversed a trial courts decision and ruled that an insured could proceed with his lawsuit against his insurer for bad faith stemming from, among other things, his claim for stolen baseball cards.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit refused to grant Allstate a new trial.

Geico appealed a jury's large award of damages on an underlying uninsured/underinsured motorist claim.

A court has ruled that a 'broad exclusion' for earth movement in a homeowners policy precluded coverage for damage that resulted when a large rock damaged a home.

A California court finds an insurance company could void a homeowners policy based on the insureds 'significant and unexplained misrepresentations.'

A California court finds an insurance company could void a homeowners policy based on the insureds 'significant and unexplained misrepresentations.'

A federal district court in California has upheld an insurance companys denial of its insureds claim for the theft of his motor home, based in large part on his sons cell phone records.