(Bloomberg) -- A federal judge said he doubted Target Corp.’s argument its customers weren’t harmed after hackers stole charge-card data belonging to millions of people during last year’s holiday shopping season.

“You have people here who were honest to goodness hurt, who were injured,” U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson told the company’s lawyer, Harold McElhinny, at a hearing today in St. Paul, Minnesota. “Now, whether that’s Target’s fault is for another day.”

Target is asking Magnuson to throw out about six dozen consumer lawsuits filed across the U.S. after last year’s incursion and consolidated before him. McElhinny told the judge card-issuing banks reimburse customers for fraudulent charges.

The Minneapolis-based company is one of several retailers, including Barnes & Noble Inc., Home Depot Inc. and Neiman Marcus Group LLC, that have been sued by customers after data thieves invaded their computer systems.

Federal judges in Chicago dismissed the cases against Neiman Marcus and Barnes & Noble, citing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that Amnesty International couldn’t challenge a U.S. government surveillance program unless those who feared they were being spied on at least faced “certainly impending” harm. Target has cited the same case.

The Neiman Marcus ruling is being appealed, and customers in the Barnes & Noble case have refiled their suit.

Target Shoppers

Lawyers for Target’s shoppers contend fallout from the hacking forced their customers to contend with frozen bank accounts, late fees and other costs.

“We’re not here today because Target got hacked,” plaintiffs’ attorney Vincent Esades told the judge today. “We’re here because of Target’s conduct, the failure to stop it from happening.”

The case is In Re. Target Corp. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, 14-md-2522, U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota (St. Paul).

Special Reports /

Judge doubts Target's claim that no one was hurt by last year's breach

Related Stories

Recommended For You