NU Online News Service, Nov. 8, 3:38 p.m. EST
In an important ruling this summer, the Eighth Circuit Court ofAppeals decided that an online marketing firm was entitled todefense cost coverage under two different types of liabilitypolicies for the same spyware download incident.
Lawyers Richard J. Bortnick and Stephanie Gantman of CozenO'Connor detailed the facts of the underlying case and thesubsequent ruling by the July 23, 2010 ruling by the appeals courtin Eyeblaster Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co. in a special article published in this week's edition ofNational Underwriter's print magazine.
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
