Pennsylvania Supreme Court building The plaintiffs in the case, captioned Franks v. State Farm Mutual, claimed State Farm should have paid $200,000 in coverage for Robert Franks’ 2016 accident with an uninsured driver — double the amount State Farm had offered. (Credit: Cascade Creatives/Shutterstock)

In a first-impression matter centered on when auto insurance customers can waive stacking benefits, plaintiffs counsel argued before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday that deleting a vehicle from an insurance policy constitutes a “purchase.” 

The justices, however, did not seem convinced. 

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free
PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader.


  • All news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including and

Already have an account?


Complex Claims & Litigation Forum 2023Event

Aimed to help Insurers prevent, prepare and prevail In adjudicating complex claims, negotiating settlements and winning cases.

Get More Information


Join PropertyCasualty360

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed decisions for your P&C insurance business. Join now!

  • Unlimited access to - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including, and
  • Exclusive discounts on PropertyCasualty360, National Underwriter, Claims and ALM events

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join PropertyCasualty360

Copyright © 2023 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.