In Maryland Casualty Co. v. Martinez, the insured had died and the brother-in-law of the insured's caretaker was driving the vehicle at the time of an accident. The court found that the insurer did not have to provide a defense since neither the surviving spouse nor the legal representative were driving the vehicle at the time of loss. (Credit: Kzenon/Shutterstock.com) In Maryland Casualty Co. v. Martinez, the insured had died and the brother-in-law of the insured’s caretaker was driving the vehicle at the time of an accident. The court found that the insurer did not have to provide a defense since neither the surviving spouse nor the legal representative were driving the vehicle at the time of loss. (Credit: Kzenon/Shutterstock.com)

We had an insured pass away and his son continued paying his auto insurance premium and allowing his grandson to drive the only listed auto on this policy. Do you see any coverage concerns with this? Any grounds for denial?

— Ohio Subscriber

FC&S Editors

 

PropertyCasualty360

Join PropertyCasualty360

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed decisions for your P&C insurance business. Join PropertyCasualty360.com now!

  • Unlimited access to PropertyCasualty360.com - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including BenefitsPRO.com, ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
  • Exclusive discounts on PropertyCasualty360, National Underwriter, Claims and ALM events

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join PropertyCasualty360

Copyright © 2022 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.