Lovers Lane sign. (Credit: PAUL FARMER/Wikicommons) In a concurring opinion, Judge Tom Chapman wrote that he believes that Geico was offered "no meaningful opportunity to participate" in the lawsuit, and that existing law "relegat[es] the insurer to the status of a bystander," which could be important for insurance litigation in the future. (Credit: PAUL FARMER/Wikicommons)
The Missouri Court of Appeals has affirmed the decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, that an insurance company must pay a $5.2 million settlement granted to a woman who claimed she unwittingly caught a sexually transmitted disease from her former romantic partner in his car which was covered by the insurer.

In its opinion, the three-judge panel found that the judgment entered against Geico General Insurance Company during earlier arbitration proceedings was valid. The insurer sought to undo the action, and claimed that there were errors made at the lower court level, and that the settlement agreement was not in line with Missouri law.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.