Insurers encountering PFAS contamination claims face decades of potentially implicated policies and may evaluate pollution exclusions as a basis for limiting or precluding coverage. (Photo: kzenon/Shutterstock)
Does a recent $17,500,000 settlement between residents of the Town of Peshtigo, Wisconsin, and manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) foreshadow an impending claim boom?
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
- Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
- Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
