Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Photographers are using drones for many events, but not all operators have the correct insurance coverage. (Photo: Shutterstock)

A federal district court in California has ruled that an insurance company had no duty to defend its insured against claims that a drone it was operating at a wedding had severely injured a guest.

Related: Keeping up with commercial drone risks

The case

Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company received notice from Darshan Kamboj that she had been injured when a drone operated by Satyam Sukhwal on behalf of his employer, Hollycal Production, Inc., to photograph a wedding that Kamboj was attending made contact with her eye.

Steven A. Meyerowitz


Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed decisions for your P&C insurance business. Join PropertyCasualty360.com now!

  • Unlimited access to PropertyCasualty360.com - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including BenefitsPRO.com, ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
  • Exclusive discounts on PropertyCasualty360, National Underwriter, Claims and ALM events

Already have an account? Sign In Now

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.