With a Florida legislative battle brewing again about the issue,an appeals court has ruled against a property insurer's effort toplace restrictions on a controversial practice known as “assignmentof benefits.”

The Fifth District Court of Appeal, in an eight-page rulingFriday, upheld a decision by the Florida Office ofInsurance Regulation to reject restrictions proposed bySecurityFirst Insurance Co.

Driving up property-insurance premiums

The ruling was another blow to the insurance industry, which hasblamed assignment of benefits for driving up property-insurancepremiums, but has been unable to persuade lawmakers to make changesto the long-standing practice.

A three-judge panel of the appeals court pointed to past legalrulings about assignment of benefits and said it was up to theFlorida Legislature to decide whether to make changes.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.