Many decades ago, beginning adjusters often heard the phrase, "it's a jury question," meaning that the facts were not clear enough to decide if the insured was responsible for what happened or the claimant was at fault. What this really meant was that there was not yet enough information to make a correct decision and it was necessary to "go dig some more," with documentation, photos, diagrams, statements, data and details. Why? Because it is too expensive to litigate every claim.
Only when adjusters dig as deep as possible into the facts and lay them out logically in a report, will the kind of decision a judge and jury make be the result. Judges and juries don't always get it right, and neither will adjusters. But if enough research has occurred, the odds for correct decisions increase. If an allegation of coverage, liability, damage or injury is not valid, a wrong decision to settle will be expensive. But a wrong decision to deny a valid claim will be even more expensive if it results in litigation.
What is Litigation?
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
- Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
- Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
