WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Treasury Department on Thursdayissued proposed rules aimed at easing the requirements forcompanies and insurers when they report employees' health coverageinformation to comply with President Barack Obama'ssignature healthcare law.

|

The proposed regulations are a key element of the employermandate portion of the law. Implementation of the rules had beendelayed while the Treasury Department attempted to simplify them toaddress concerns of employers.

|

"We will continue to consider ways, consistent with the law, tosimply the new information reporting process," said Mark Mazur,assistant treasury secretary for tax policy.

|

The law, widely known as Obamacare, requires employers with 50or more workers to offer their full-time employees a minimum levelof health insurance coverage or be subject to a fee.

|

If companies do not offer coverage and have at least onefull-time worker receiving government tax credits to buy insurance,employers are assessed a fee of $2,000 per full-time employee,excluding the first 30 workers.

|

The administration caused a stir in July when it unexpectedlydelayed the effective date for the reporting and for the employermandate itself to 2015 from 2014.

|

Retailers in particular had complained about the law's detailedreporting requirements. A trade group commended the Obamaadministration for taking action to lighten the burden ofthe law. But the group's lobbyist said the administration did notgo far enough.

|

"One thing retailers and other employers hate more than anythingelse is sending the same information to different agencies,"said Neil Trautwein with the National RetailFederation, which represents Wal-Mart, Macy's Inc. andothers.

|

The group wants the Internal RevenueService to work with the Health and HumanServices Administration to simplify the rules further.

|

Although the employer mandate has been delayed, the separaterequirement that all individuals carry health insurance or pay afee, goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2014.

|

Thursday's proposal would, among other things, eliminate theneed for employers to determine whether particular employees arefull-time where adequate coverage is offered to all "potentiallyfull-time employees." It also would let employers report specificcosts for health plans only if the cost is above a certainthreshold dollar amount.

|

The proposed rules would also allow, in certain instances, thereporting of healthcare information on W-2 tax forms that employersissue to workers, rather than a separate statement.

|

When the government delayed the effective dates of the mandateand reporting, they requested that companies voluntarily reportstarting in 2014.

|

Cathy Livingston, who worked on the health care rules as an IRSattorney, said it is likely that "a very limited number of entitieswould voluntarily choose to report."

|

"Employers and insurers will likely take a pass," saidLivingston, now in private practice at Jones Day.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

  • All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.