Claims managers and their IT partners are faced with a dilemma when it comes to making the decision to build or buy their next claims software solution. The choice, which is not always clear cut, affects nearly every aspect of the claims process, from a minor workflow improvement to the transformation of the entire claims organization. Making the wrong selection can create havoc resulting in unintentional, inefficient processes, hidden costs, and productivity loss.

When making the decision to build a claims solution, managers often use some common justifications such as getting the solution developed to a carrier’s exact specifications and IT budget. By building in-house, the hope is that the carrier will get perfect alignment with current or desired future processes. If the solution only seems to require a one-time upfront payment, building might keep costs down while granting internal stakeholders control over the design and implementation of the solution.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free
PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader.


  • All news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including and

Already have an account?


© 2023 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.



Join PropertyCasualty360

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed decisions for your P&C insurance business. Join now!

  • Unlimited access to - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including, and
  • Exclusive discounts on PropertyCasualty360, National Underwriter, Claims and ALM events

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join PropertyCasualty360

Copyright © 2023 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.