NU's latest quarterly ethics column focused on the controversy over whether insurance agents and brokers can continue accepting contingency fees from insurers for producing a certain volume or quality of business without creating a conflict of interest between what's best for their clients against what benefits the agency's bottom line. Read on for reader reaction and to file your own comments.
The column was prepared by Peter R. Kensicki, a professor of insurance at Eastern Kentucky University in Richmond, Ky., as well as a member of the Ethics Committee of the CPCU Society. (You may reach Prof. Kensicki at [email protected].) We thank all of those who responded to NU's query, and invite you to continue the dialogue here on my blog.
***
Recommended For You
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© Touchpoint Markets, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more inforrmation visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
