In my Sept. 3 blog entry, I ran a column by my fellow editor at NU's life and health weekly, Steve Piontek, hammering insurance regulators in general, and the NAIC in particular, for allowing a revolving door to keep swinging between the industry and the insurance departments overseeing the business. I agreed with Steve's take, noting that I couldn't have said it better myself. But this week I published a counterpoint by Caroline Scott, a former general counsel of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Read on and let me know what you think.
Ms. Scott, who is also a former general counsel at the Texas Department of Insurance, is currently a partner at Casey, Gentz & Magness LLP in Austin, Texas. Here is her view on this controversy:
Knowledge Needs Trump Revolving Door Concerns
Recommended For You
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
