Search
 

Is The Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Ethical?

Litigation and policy debates among state and federal lawmakers have exploded over the controversial anti-concurrent-causation clauses in homeowners policies--which deny coverage for most, if not ...

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Litigation and policy debates among state and federal lawmakers have exploded over the controversial anti-concurrent-causation clauses in homeowners policies–which deny coverage for most, if not all windstorm losses when excluded flood-related damage is also involved. Consumer advocates call the clause confusing at best, and at worst a trap door to deny insureds their legitimate coverage. Click on to see some of the ethical questions we raise for readers, and feel free to respond–either directly to this blog, or to our ethics columnist.

Recommended Stories

Big opioid companies agree to pay $260 million

Jef Feeley and Riley Griffin |

Drug wholesalers and Teva Pharmaceutical settle the first federal trial over the companies’ role in fueling the U.S. opioid epidemic.

PropertyCasualty360

Join PropertyCasualty360

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed decisions for your P&C insurance business. Join PropertyCasualty360.com now!

  • Unlimited access to PropertyCasualty360.com - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including BenefitsPRO.com, ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
  • Exclusive discounts on PropertyCasualty360, National Underwriter, Claims and ALM events

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join PropertyCasualty360

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.