WASHINGTON–Trade groups representing mostly smaller insurers have split over what provisions should be part of legislation to extend government supports for insurers' high-level terrorism losses.

The disagreements involve the American Insurance Association on one side and paired against it the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI) and National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies on the other.

Among other things PCI and NAMIC feel the AIA jumped the gun in announcing an agreement with the Coalition to Insure Against Terrorism over a proposed provision for an extension of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act.

Recommended For You

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© Touchpoint Markets, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more inforrmation visit Asset & Logo Licensing.