A Case Against Reinsurance Arbitration?

Private arbitration has long been the dispute resolution forum of choice in the treaty reinsurance business. Arbitration of disputes, with decisions made by experienced industry executives familiar with “custom and practice” in the industry, has itself become the “custom and practice.”

Most treaties contain arbitration clauses requiring all disputes to be resolved by a panel of three arbitrators with experience in the industry. Under these provisions, reinsurance arbitrators are often relieved of the obligation to follow the strict rules of law that would apply in court, and are encouraged to view the relationship between cedent and reinsurer as an “honorable engagement,” with the goal of arriving at a just result.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free
PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader.


  • All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.

Already have an account?


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.



Join PropertyCasualty360

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed decisions for your P&C insurance business. Join PropertyCasualty360.com now!

  • Unlimited access to PropertyCasualty360.com - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including BenefitsPRO.com, ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
  • Exclusive discounts on PropertyCasualty360, National Underwriter, Claims and ALM events

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join PropertyCasualty360

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.