{
  "author": {
    "name": "Damian Cleary",
    "webUrl": "/author/profile/damian-cleary/",
    "description": "",
    "imageLarge": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/f16d6fc2845f417ea0e93a3f2b6cd37d?s=136&d=mm&r=g",
    "estimate": 1,
    "social": [],
    "articles": [
      {
        "uri": "/2021/01/06/applying-the-but-for-test-to-wide-area-damage-part-3/",
        "title": "Applying the 'but for' test to wide-area damage (part 3)",
        "byline": "Damian Cleary",
        "kicker": "Analysis",
        "prettyDate": "January 06, 2021",
        "timeToRead": "14 minute",
        "image": {
          "uri": "https://images.propertycasualty360.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/414/2021/01/hurricane-Katrina-1.jpg-image620x372-1.jpg",
          "width": "620",
          "height": "372"
        },
        "authors": [
          {
            "webUrl": "/author/profile/damian-cleary/",
            "name": "Damian Cleary"
          }
        ],
        "kickerNode": [
          {
            "uri": "/analysis/",
            "sectionName": "Analysis"
          }
        ],
        "summary": "Part three of this series examines concurrent causations and how to apply them to business interruption claims.",
        "body": null
      }
    ]
  }
}