Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Business success strategy with collaboration, teamwork or negotiation jigsaw key, miniature people businessmen handshaking on white jigsaw puzzle piece in real human hand, dark black background. Credit: Nuthawut/Adobe Stock According to a recent American Bar Association (ABA) study, from 2020 through the first quarter of 2021, 65% of private M&A transaction agreements explicitly referred to RWI, up from 52% during the period from 2018-2019 and 29% during the period from 2016-2017. (Credit: Nuthawut/Adobe Stock)

When first introduced, representations and warranties insurance (RWI) proved attractive to parties to private merger & acquisition (M&A) transactions primarily because it allowed sellers to reduce their exposure to post-closing indemnity obligations arising from breaches of representations and warranties by transferring some of the risk to the insurer.

As the use of RWI has increased over the past decade, it has become more common for RWI to be used either as a complete substitute for a seller indemnity for breaches of representations and warranties (in the absence of seller fraud) or for the seller to retain only a nominal indemnity obligation capped at an amount equivalent to all or a portion of the retention under the RWI policy (typically .75%-1% of enterprise value, in the aggregate, for domestic transactions).



Join PropertyCasualty360

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed decisions for your P&C insurance business. Join PropertyCasualty360.com now!

  • Unlimited access to PropertyCasualty360.com - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including BenefitsPRO.com, ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
  • Exclusive discounts on PropertyCasualty360, National Underwriter, Claims and ALM events

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join PropertyCasualty360

Copyright © 2022 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.