A Starbucks store, partially reopened during the Coronavirus pandemic, is boarded up to protect against vandalism during the days of demonstrations protesting the killing of George Floyd and police brutality, Washington, D.C. June 6, 2020. (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM) A Starbucks store, partially reopenedduring the Coronavirus pandemic, is boarded up to protect againstvandalism during the days of demonstrations protesting the killingof George Floyd and police brutality, Washington, D.C. June 6,2020. (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought a wave of businessinterruption claims and related coverage lawsuits from businessesimpacted by widespread closures.

These businesses already face significant hurdles in obtainingcoverage for pandemic-related losses, as insurers and policyholderslitigate over whether COVID-19 contamination and mandatory closuresto force social distancing measures to constitute "directphysical loss of or damage to property" sufficient to triggercoverage under business interruption policies.In these suits, insurers have argued that these policies provisionswere written to insure against natural disasters that causetangible physical damage to property such as hurricanes andearthquakes, not viral pandemics. At least one court has agreed.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.