Perhaps the biggest disincentive for airlines to keep tabs of how attendants — or passengers — are sexually harassed or assaulted is that they don’t have to. There is no federal law requiring them to report incidents or keep records of complaints. (Photo: Noriko Hayashi/Bloomberg) Perhaps the biggest disincentive for airlines to keep tabs of how attendants — or passengers — are sexually harassed or assaulted is that they don’t have to. There is no federal law requiring them to report incidents or keep records of complaints. (Photo: Noriko Hayashi/Bloomberg)

(Bloomberg) — From Southwest’s “hostesses” in the 1970s to Hooters Air to the Vietnamese budget carrier whose flight attendants were made to wear bikinis, airlines have a long history of sexualizing the role of flight attendants.

Their victimization continues to this day. More than a third of flight attendants said they had experienced sexual harassment over the past year, with almost one in five suffering physical assaults such as touching or groping, according to a 2018 survey of 3,500 attendants by the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA) union.

Last year, the #MeToo movement’s exposure of ghastly workplace behavior finally reached the airlines. As part of legislation funding the Federal Aviation Administration, Congress formed a task force aimed at addressing sexual misconduct up in the sky. Its goal was to review airline training and incident reporting so as to better protect employees and passengers.

“It needs to be that we have a zero-tolerance policy,” said Lyn Montgomery, a Southwest Airlines Co. flight attendant for the past 27 years. “You don’t get away with something in the air that you can’t on the ground.”

Related: A risk manager’s take on workplace harassment

A task force is formed

In November, the Trump administration put its stamp on the effort, shifting the 14-member task force under a four-person Aviation Consumer Protection Advisory Committee (ACPAC) that reports to U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao. “The #MeToo movement seems to be making an impression in a lot of different areas,” said Judith Kaleta, the DOT’s deputy general counsel and the task force’s chair. “Organizations are putting new policies in place.”

Consumer advocates and flight attendants, however, accuse Chao of putting the task force squarely in the pocket of airline management. The DOT excluded consumer advocates and the AFA, which had focused on combating harassment, while putting a representative of an anti-regulation, pro-business group on the advisory committee overseeing the task force.

“Failing to include a genuine consumer representative with experience and expertise in consumer travel issues is yet another example of how the DOT is dedicated to the profits of the airline industry at the expense of consumers,” Kurt Ebenhoch, executive director of Travel Fairness Now, a consumer-advocacy group, said in a statement.

Mixing alcohol with public incivility in a small enclosed space can create a hostile environment for anyone — but especially for flight attendants, who must interact with passengers. The purpose of the task force is to help standardize how illegal behavior is reported, since right now procedures vary by carrier, and even by incident. Another goal of the legislation was to facilitate industrywide crew training.

‘A daisy chain of reporting’

Corporate representatives of the airlines have praised the initiative. Allison Ausband, Delta Air Lines Inc.’s senior vice president for in-flight services, said we “totally changed our training” after the carrier began listening to flight attendants’ stories amid #MeToo news coverage. Ausband and Sharon Pinkerton, a senior vice president at Airlines for America, the airline industry’s Washington lobbyist group, represent the companies on the task force. (Delta isn’t part of the trade group.)

“This was a huge opportunity for us to make it safer for them and our customers by providing more training,” Ausband said. “The committee really is a platform for putting sexual assault under a microscope.”

In-flight sexual abuse cases fall under federal jurisdiction, and are thus subject to stiff penalties, including potential prison time. But the typical victim of sexual misconduct at 35,000 feet faces a bureaucratic obstacle course to seek criminal charges, according to flight attendants and consumer advocates.

Generally, a flight attendant must first notify the captain, who reports the incident to the airline’s dispatch staff, who then would call airport law enforcement agencies to meet the aircraft at its arrival gate, according to flight attendants. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is the law enforcement agency that handles such incidents.

“It’s all based on the airline policy or the whim of the individual, and we think 90 percent of these things get lost in that daisy chain of reporting,” said Paul Hudson, president of FlyersRights.org, a passenger advocacy group. Once the plane lands and the passengers disperse, it’s too late, said Hudson, a former chief attorney for the New York State Crime Victims Board. “Speed is essential in these type of things.”

Related: Sexual harassment cases surged last year in wake of #MeToo: Seyfarth report

The time to reform is now

The current reporting system can be cumbersome for both victims and flight attendants, who need greater training, said Sara Nelson, president of the AFA, which has 50,000 members working at 20 airlines. The union, which has been seeking reform of airline policies on sexual misconduct, was excluded from the task force by Chao.

“If we had airports and airlines working together on this from the airport to the front of the airplane and back out to the cabin, it would be so much more effective,” said Nelson, a 23-year attendant with United. “Make it integrated into the entire operation.”

Perhaps the biggest disincentive for airlines to keep tabs of how attendants — or passengers — are sexually harassed or assaulted is that they don’t have to. There is no federal law requiring them to report incidents or keep records of complaints. This curbs the number of investigations, Hudson said.

“It’s fair to say that some incidents don’t get reported in a timely manner, which really hampers the ability of law enforcement to respond and investigate,” said Christopher Bidwell, a senior vice president of security at the Airports Council International-North America in Washington, a lobbyist organization for airports.

Still, some airlines are viewed by flight attendant unions as more responsive than others. The AFA has lauded Alaska Air Group Inc. for implementing a zero-tolerance policy on sexual harassment and United Continental Holdings Inc. for public comments on the issue by its chief executive. Seattle-based Alaska was thrust into the #MeToo spotlight in late 2017 when former Facebook executive Randi Zuckerberg, sister of founder Mark Zuckerberg, detailed her experience of being subjected to “explicit, lewd and highly offensive sexual comments” by another passenger on an Alaska flight to Mexico.

Related: Sexual assault: Is there insurance coverage for that?

Copyright 2019 Bloomberg. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.