In an important ruling this summer, the Eighth Circuit Court ofAppeals decided that an online marketing firm was entitled todefense cost coverage under two different types of liabilitypolicies for the same spyware download incident.
On July 23, 2010, ruling in Eyeblaster Inc. v. Federal Ins.Co., the court found concurrent coverage under both a generalliability insurance policy and a separate Information and NetworkTechnology errors and omissions liability policy in circumstanceswhere the online marketer company installed software on aconsumer's computer system, allegedly corrupting the consumer'soperating system.
THE POLICIES
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
