What the U.S. homeowners insurance market urgently needs is greater policy form standardization, with insurers taking their cues from independent rating organizations rather than their own underwriters–at least that's what University of Minnesota Associate Law Professor Daniel Schwarcz told the National Association of Insurance Commissioners at their recent meeting in Seattle, as reported by National Underwriter on Aug. 19 (see http://bit.ly/dBGYJi).
Professor Schwarcz's PowerPoint presentation to the NAIC–titled "Deficient Consumer Protection in the Regulation of Insurance Policy Forms: Evidence from Homeowners Markets"–asserted that homeowners insurance policyholders in 2010 have fewer financial protections listed in their policies, protecting them against a diminishing number of perils, than they did five- or 10 years ago.
That is simply not the case. While every homeowners policy provides a baseline of essential coverages–financial protection against losses arising from a fire, windstorm or theft–each insurer then distinguishes and differentiates itself in the market by offering an array of policies to suit the many and varied interests of their customers.
Recommended For You
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© Touchpoint Markets, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more inforrmation visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
