Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A federal judge in Virginia rescinded a legal malpractice insurance policy after finding that the firm’s ignorance of one attorney’s embezzlement of client funds could not save coverage for malpractice lawsuits against it, according to an article in Andrews Publications.

U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson of the Eastern District of Virginia said everyone in the firm—Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Co.–was bound by the policy wording that did not provide for qualification of the representations in the application as being “to the best of their knowledge.”

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free
PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader.


  • All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.

Already have an account?


Join PropertyCasualty360

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed decisions for your P&C insurance business. Join PropertyCasualty360.com now!

  • Unlimited access to PropertyCasualty360.com - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including BenefitsPRO.com, ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com
  • Exclusive discounts on PropertyCasualty360, National Underwriter, Claims and ALM events

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join PropertyCasualty360

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.