The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision earlier this month, that a company must show intent to dispose of chemicals to be liable as an “arranger” under the “Superfund Law,” could benefit corporations caught up in potential liabilities under that statute, a legal expert said.

Because the 8-1 decision, reached on May 4, limits the definition of “arrange for” to the ordinary meaning of the words, David Erickson, a partner for the environmental practice in the Kansas City office of Shook, Hardy and Bacon, LLP, said the group of people who can be held liable as an arranger shrinks.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free
PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader.


  • All news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
  • Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
  • Other award-winning websites including and

Already have an account?

Dig Deeper



Join PropertyCasualty360

Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed decisions for your P&C insurance business. Join now!

  • Unlimited access to - your roadmap to thriving in a disrupted environment
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including, and
  • Exclusive discounts on PropertyCasualty360, National Underwriter, Claims and ALM events

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join PropertyCasualty360

Copyright © 2023 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.