Does the crisis at AIG and the fear of a meltdown in the U.S. financial services system prove Washington should be allowed to regulate insurance–or exactly the opposite? The answer depends on whether you're for or against an optional federal charter, a debate between leaders of one pro-OFC insurer group and a state lawmaker association opposing the concept revealed.

"The recent turmoil in our economy highlights a number of flaws in financial services regulation, including insurance," according to American Insurance Association President Marc Racicot, whose group strongly supports an OFC.

But George Keiser, a Republican representative in the North Dakota legislature, as well as secretary of the National Conference of Insurance Legislators, begged to differ. He suggested that the recent troubles on Wall Street and with AIG demonstrate that Washington shouldn't be trusted to impose a "one-size-fits-all" regulatory system on the industry.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader

Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking insurance news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Weekly Insurance Speak podcast featuring exclusive interviews with industry leaders
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, BenefitsPRO and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.