Coverage Format


December 05, 2022

Whether an insurer has a duty to defend arises in almost every liability insurance claim. A less common question is when the duty ends. Judge Sarah…

December 05, 2022

This is an introduction to and analysis of new ISO endorsements being made available to exclude commercial umbrella and excess liability exposures of or relating to PFAS chemicals.

December 05, 2022

Liberty Mutual successfully argued the application of a total pollution exclusion to a claim by Central Crude, Inc. for costs related to environmental remediation and litigation defense for a January 2007 oil spill in Paradis, Louisiana.

December 05, 2022

When the burned vegetables aren't the result of an inept chef.

December 05, 2022

A tree house is damaged in a fire, along with several other insured buildings. However, the tree house was not listed on the property declarations, and the subscriber asks if it is covered as an outdoor fixture on form CP 00 99.

November 30, 2022

The employer claimed the man's injuries weren't compensable because he had not arrived at the employer's premises at the time of injury. The man asserted he was performing work-related duties as assigned and directed by the employer when the collision occurred.

November 30, 2022

The employer claimed the man's injuries weren't compensable because he had not arrived at the employer's premises at the time of injury. The man asserted he was performing work-related duties as assigned and directed by the employer when the collision occurred.

November 30, 2022

The employer claimed the man's injuries weren't compensable because he had not arrived at the employer's premises at the time of injury. The man asserted he was performing work-related duties as assigned and directed by the employer when the collision occurred.

November 29, 2022

Click here for ICLC Expert Analysis.<br>Fine Arts Discovery Series, Inc.<br>v.<br>Critton<br>Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania<br>September 15, 2022, Argued; October…

November 29, 2022

The employer asserted the "positive work order" defense, which required proof that there was a specific policy in place, the claimant knew about the employer's policy, and that the claimant's conduct at the time of injury removed the claimant from the course of employment.