If a person is injured while driving an employer-provided vehicle and receives UIM benefits from the employer's insurer, can that person stack those UIM benefits with UIM coverage from a personal auto policy?

The plaintiff argued that the two lawsuits are not related claims, defined in the policy, since they involve different time periods, locations, plaintiffs, and management agreements, while the insurer countered that they are related claims since both lawsuits are based on the plaintiff's rental management program.

This case shows one of the key differences between occurrence-based and claims-made policies.

The plaintiff argued the harm was caused by the publication of false data, but the insurer claimed it was the professional services that produced the false data. Who is correct?

When numerous claims against the same entity involve the same or similar questions of law or fact, it may be more efficient to litigate a single class action instead of individual cases.

If the named insured on a policy is not part of a lawsuit, how does it affect coverage for an additional insured on that policy?

A man sought UM coverage for his ATV and his trailer, which were both totaled in a collision with an uninsured driver. Is coverage available?

The insurer wanted strict compliance from the policyholder, but state law only required substantial compliance.

A man was driving his friend's car to a tire shop for repairs and had an auto accident. Was he driving a "non-owned auto" for coverage purposes?

The court refused to interpret the policy at issue in a way that contradicted the express terms of that policy.