Sub-sections:
The South Carolina Supreme Court looked at the Joint Employer Doctrine to determine if both employers would be held responsible for the workers' injuries.
A South Carolina District Court examined whether a liquor liability's assault and battery exclusion was applicable.
The court analyzed the Massachusetts Standard Policy and statute on actual cash value in making their determination.
The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed a trial court's order based on their interpretation of the insurance contract.
The court made their determination based on the policy language of each individual contract.
The court made their determination based on the policy language of each individual contract.
The court ruled in that way because traveling employees are governed by slightly different rules from regular employees.
Is UIM stacking permitted when the policyholder was killed while driving a riding lawn mower?
A discussion of a bulletin published by the Louisiana Department of Insurance reminding insurers of the data call.
On a policy endorsement for "Newly Acquired or Constructed Property," does the term "acquired" refer to legal possession or physical possession?