This case shows one of the key differences between occurrence-based and claims-made policies.

The plaintiff argued the harm was caused by the publication of false data, but the insurer claimed it was the professional services that produced the false data. Who is correct?

When numerous claims against the same entity involve the same or similar questions of law or fact, it may be more efficient to litigate a single class action instead of individual cases.

If the named insured on a policy is not part of a lawsuit, how does it affect coverage for an additional insured on that policy?

A man sought UM coverage for his ATV and his trailer, which were both totaled in a collision with an uninsured driver. Is coverage available?

The insurer wanted strict compliance from the policyholder, but state law only required substantial compliance.

A man was driving his friend's car to a tire shop for repairs and had an auto accident. Was he driving a "non-owned auto" for coverage purposes?

The court refused to interpret the policy at issue in a way that contradicted the express terms of that policy.

Is a disagreement over the cause of an underlying suit enough for an insured's suit to survive summary judgment?

Does it go against public policy to exclude coverage for damages to the insured's vehicle that were incurred while the insured was driving drunk?