A commercial auto checklist applicable to the business auto policy.

In reversing the appellate court, the Arizona Supreme Court relied on a 1986 decision of the same court that held negligence, when standing alone, does not cross the line that would warrant additional damages.

<embed frameBorders="0" scrolling="auto" height="1000px" width="100%" src="https://assets.touchpointmarkets.com/96/3a/962d53154dbbb5b36c766766bd57/ca-27-21-09-22-abuse-or-molestation-exclusion-for-general-liability-and-acts-errors-or-omissions-liability-coverages.pdf"/>

<embed frameBorders="0" scrolling="auto" height="1000px" width="100%" src="https://assets.touchpointmarkets.com/a5/c3/d3f340444114ab947925726a4c36/ca-28-03-09-22-abuse-or-molestation-exclusion-for-covered-autos-liability-exposure.pdf"/>

<embed frameBorders="0" scrolling="auto" height="1000px" width="100%" src="https://assets.touchpointmarkets.com/4e/7e/194a303e40d38c87962e14e87899/ca-27-24-09-22-cannabis-exclusion-with-hemp-and-lessor-risk-exception-for-general-liability-coverages.pdf"/>

<embed frameBorders="0" scrolling="auto" height="1000px" width="100%" src="https://assets.touchpointmarkets.com/a0/bd/96ac04c84d41b0a819700beec59e/ca-27-23-09-22-sexual-abuse-or-sexual-molestation-liability-coverage.pdf"/>

<embed frameBorders="0" scrolling="auto" height="1000px" width="100%" src="https://assets.touchpointmarkets.com/7c/1b/a4f516da40c1a163c38c69e6d073/ca-27-22-09-22-abuse-or-molestation-exclusion-for-general-liability-and-acts-errors-or-omissions-liability-coverages.pdf"/>

<embed frameBorders="0" scrolling="auto" height="1000px" width="100%" src="https://assets.touchpointmarkets.com/a0/9f/f20fe6d44711880ae98305e629a7/ca-27-21-09-22-abuse-or-molestation-exclusion-for-general-liability-and-acts-errors-or-omissions-liability-coverages.pdf"/>

What happens when an unlisted trailer is stolen.

The Arizona Supreme Court has reversed a ruling that allowed the family of a victim of a fatal car crash to pursue punitive damages against a trucking company, reasserting its holding in a 1986 decision that negligent acts alone are not sufficient to tack on extra damages.