The Supreme Court of New Hampshire ruled that a man was not entitled to coverage under his automobile insurance policy for injuries he suffered when he was struck by an uninsured vehicle while crossing a street to his own parked car.

In a case of first impression, a Connecticut court ruled that the UM/UIM exclusion did not apply in this case involving the insurance coverage of a rental car.

Discusses timing of loss assessment claim and policy period and date of loss.

When a patient's chemotherapy waste affects the septic tank, is there coverage?

A mobile gym, operating out of the back of a truck, was not an insured auto for the purposes of the auto insurance policy of a woman who was injured while training in the mobile gym.

This article provides an overview of current drone capabilities and insurance, including a list of FC&S articles on drones.

A Washington company has been fined for violating state laws by selling unauthorized insurance that illegally covers defense cost for criminal shootings.

In a long-awaited Washington Supreme Court insurance bad faith decision, the court decided that the employee adjuster was not guilty of bad faith.

This article discusses and explains intrafamily and household exclusions.

This November Claims Magazine article by Christine G. Barlow, CPCU discusses the racing exclusion and unusual situations such as driving performance vehicles for recreation.