The court reviewed the elements required in the Utah Code to prove a worker is owed permanent total disability benefits.

The Arizona Supreme Court rejected the standard used by a lower court in favor of a subjective standard focused on the knowledge of the parties.

The court made its determination after analyzing the Insurance Code and the state's no-fault act.

The West Virginia Appellate Court affirmed the ruling of the Workers' Compensation Board of Review after finding that the three elements of compensability were met.

The Texas Supreme Court rejected the insured's argument that the disputes with the insurer were coverage issues and not disputes on the amount of the loss.

The Florida Supreme Court overturned a lower court's ruling after finding it did not apply the correct causation standard for a workers' compensation case.

An Ohio appeals court reversed the lower court's ruling in favor of the insurer after reviewing the policy language.

A US District Court found that under the circumstances of the case, a notice 46 days after the loss was not prompt.

A Wisconsin appellate court rejected the homeowner's economic argument since the valued policy law had no such consideration.

A Texas Court of Appeals affirmed judgment in favor of the insurer after determining whether the employee's commute originated in the business.