A Wisconsin appellate court rejected the homeowner's economic argument since the valued policy law had no such consideration.

A Texas Court of Appeals affirmed judgment in favor of the insurer after determining whether the employee's commute originated in the business.

The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the ruling after analyzing each type of policy to determine if coverage was provided.

The appellate court reversed the judgment of a district court after determining that allegations of negligence in the underlying suit were enough to trigger the insurer's duty to defend.

A US District Court ruled that a management agreement does not override the provisions of an insurance contract.

The court considered three arguments made by Allstate before making their ruling.

A United States District Court ruled against the insured after ruling that NFIP policies must be strictly adhered to since they are paid with federal funds.

A US District Court made the ruling after analyzing the insurance policy to determine the intended coverage.

The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's ruling after applying a strict liability standard.

The Delaware Superior Court reversed the ruling by the Industrial Accident Board after finding that the employee was acting outside the course and scope of his employment.