As of May 5, 2020, this case is not available on Lexis Advance.

A Florida court has granted summary judgment in favor of an insurer in a case in which a property owner sought coverage for water damage to its building from Hurricane Irma.

The decision, from a three-judge panel of the Manhattan-based appeals court, wiped out a 2017 verdict by a federal jury in the Northern District of New York.

A federal court in Florida has highlighted a split among Florida district courts regarding whether to include statutory attorneys' fees when calculating whether an insurance coverage case removed from state court meets the amount in controversy requirement under federal law.

"These holdings reflect a principle as old as the nation itself: The government should honor its obligations," Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the 8-1 majority.

While most of these cases have to do with business interruption and the virus exclusion, there are a couple of outliers. This article was adapted from ICLC, Insurance Coverage Law Center.

Attorneys who worked directly on the latest Montrose case comment on the ramifications of the decision out of the California Supreme Court.

Attorneys who worked directly on the latest Montrose case comment on the ramifications of the decision out of the California Supreme Court.

California's First District Court of Appeal held that the ride-sharing company couldn't be held liable for injuries caused by a Lyft driver behind the wheel of a car rented as part of a company-sponsored program who collided with two vehicles while driving home from a separate job.

Discusses the Debris Removal Coverage under the ISO Causes of Loss Special Form and related optional endorsements.