<embed frameBorders="0" scrolling="auto" height="1000px" width="100%" src="https://assets.touchpointmarkets.com/40/54/40d806c24d34b716600f159c01ef/cg-27-55-09-22-supplemental-extended-reporting-period-endorsement-for-sexual-abuse-or-sexual-molestation-liability-coverage-1.pdf"/>

<embed frameBorders="0" scrolling="auto" height="1000px" width="100%" src="https://assets.touchpointmarkets.com/af/e6/8664083448b684a1c16fc73b09d8/cp-11-99-10-12-builders-risk-changes-standard-property-policy.pdf"/>

The Supreme Court of Arizona recently answered two questions certified by the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona that both concerned how an insurer may or may not use depreciation in calculating the actual cash value (ACV) of damaged property.

The Supreme Court of Arizona recently answered two questions certified by the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona that both concerned how an insurer may or may not use depreciation in calculating the actual cash value (ACV) of damaged property.

The Supreme Court of Arizona recently answered two questions certified by the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona that both concerned how an insurer may or may not use depreciation in calculating the actual cash value (ACV) of damaged property.

Presents dog bite liability laws by state.

The Alaska Supreme Court made a crucial distinction concerning the proximate cause of workplace accidents when the justices unanimously affirmed a verdict awarding benefits to an injured employee who had admitted to being impaired while at work.

The collisions and injuries have to exist on more than just paper.

Policy language regarding cosmetic repairs and an endorsement requiring like kind and quality seem to be at odds in this particular question dealing with matching.

When there's a social function at work and an employee is injured, coverage becomes complicated.