The Nevada Supreme Court adopted a minority bad faith viewpoint in the case Century Surety Co. v. Andrews.

This article discusses March Madness and the property and liability insurance issues involved.

Discusses language surrounding Opioid use and coverage.

An insurer started to defend a company with an effective reservation of rights, but that ROR was found to be ineffective as to two officers of the company.

The California Supreme Court answers the question "When a third party sues an employer for the negligent hiring, retention, and supervision of an employee who intentionally injured that third party, does that suit allege an 'occurrence' under the employer's commercial general liability policy?"

<em>Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Hollycal Production, Inc.</em> et al. No. 5:18-cv-00768, 2018

Discussion of the unique exposures faced by churches.

This article addresses issues surrounding employers allowing employees to carry concealed weapons at the worksite.

Updated discussion of Your Product and Your Work exclusions k. damage to insured's product arising out of it, and l. damage to insured's work arising out of it and included in the products-completed operations hazard.

Hudson Specialty Ins. Co. v. Snappy Slappy LLC: A federal district court in Georgia ruled that a firearms exclusion in a commercial general liability policy was ambiguous and did not bar coverage of a wrongful death suit against the insured.