A young woman was listed as a "covered insured" on the declarations page of her father's auto policy.

An insurer sought reimbursement for a claim paid due to damage from a leaking fire sprinkler.

The owner of a nightclub claimed coverage was owed for an underlying personal injury action because it made claims against both the nightclub owner and the third-party security guard hired by the nightclub.

A historic case from 1971.

Southwest Airlines spent more than $35 million in compensating customers affected by a system failure in 2016.

The court was faced with the question of whether two robberies carried out by two seemingly different groups constituted a single occurrence or multiple occurrences.

The court found the potential for coverage because the policy at issue applied to two structures that were on the same, undivided parcel of land.

The judges acknowledged the policyholder had had a string of bad luck, but even the worst of luck cannot overcome policy conditions.

Even though a company contractor painted over the posters based on incorrect instructions, he still acted intentionally in doing so.

The auto insurer refused coverage for an injury incurred while exiting a vehicle.