This article is an updated discussion of the pollution exclusion in the CGL form, referencing some court cases pertaining to the exclusion.

The Connecticut Supreme Court has decided that three business who undertook "repairs" to prevent the spread of COVID-19 weren't actually "repairs" that would give rise to a covered claim.

The judges of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals have affirmed a ruling from the Southern District of New Jersey that found a shipping company failed…

The debate before the Sixth Circuit rested on a single difference in opinion: were the damages sought in the opioid suits against Quest "because of bodily injury" under the policies from Motorists and Westfield?

The justices of the Supreme Court of Rhode Island had to decide whether the policy definition of "pollutant" was ambiguous

An agent is caught taking premiums from insureds.

The debate before the Sixth Circuit rested on a single difference in opinion: were the damages sought in the opioid suits against Quest "because of bodily injury" under the policies from Motorists and Westfield?

A new ALM course looks at the different financial aspects of funding cannabis and cannabis-related businesses.

Though the judges of the Eleventh Circuit ruled the insurer was bound to defend the insured, they said it was too early to determine the duty to indemnify.

This discussion looks at the differences between a claims-made policy and an occurrence policy, and how the retroactive date affects coverage under the claims-made form.