Andrew Larson is a litigation reporter with the Connecticut Law Tribune and can be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @drewlarson_news.
The Connecticut Supreme Court denied a plaintiff the ability to pursue claims against an insurance company for litigating in bad faith, holding that the insurer enjoyed absolute immunity.
"The plaintiff doesn't have to prove negligence, but only has to prove [the defendant is] the owner and that the dog did the damage," says Dale P. Faulkner, of New London's Faulkner & Graves.
"The gun industry is not known for self-reflection," attorney Josh Koskoff said. "We do expect the insurance industry that underwrites the gun industry will require safer marketing practices."
"The number essentially represented payment of the medical bills and $100,000 for pain and suffering," said plaintiff counsel Ryan Veilleux, of the Carter Mario Law Firm.
Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts
Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.
FC&S Coverage Insider helps you stay on top of what's happening in the industry, bringing you the latest risk and coverage analyses, discussions, and more.