Search Results

The Texas Supreme Court considered a case and focused on two questions: Who is an insured under the umbrella policy and for what coverage?

The original suit was filed within the statute of limitations for claims against living people, but outside of the limit for claims against deceased people.

Progressive admitted liability but contested the damages arguing that two years after the crash, the plaintiff was well enough to compete in horseback riding competitions and the injuries were not severe.

First Circuit presses Harvard on missed notification deadline for insurance coverage in case challenging school's admissions policy.

On the trial's third day, the plaintiff's lawyer made a discovery that 'flipped the case' and led the defendant to settle for 250% of its $1M policy.

"A plain reading of the policy provides that the parties intended to exclude coverage for COVID-19 related losses like the losses plaintiff allegedly suffered in the immediate case," the court said.

In 2012, a trial court found that Nationwide had to indemnify defendant Jeffrey S. Pasiak, according to the opinion, but the Appellate Court reversed the judgment.

"JIFs protect members against liability through 'self-insurance.' 'Self-insurance' is not insurance," New Jersey Supreme Court Justice Douglas Fasciale wrote.