{
  "author": {
    "name": "Matthew C Guy",
    "webUrl": "/author/profile/matthew-c-guy/",
    "description": "",
    "imageLarge": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/f16d6fc2845f417ea0e93a3f2b6cd37d?s=136&d=mm&r=g",
    "estimate": 1,
    "social": [],
    "articles": [
      {
        "uri": "/2023/07/18/all-my-excess-live-in-texas-texas-supreme-court-holding-on-additional-insured-status/",
        "title": "All my 'excess' live in Texas: Texas Supreme Court holding on additional insured status",
        "byline": "Matthew C. Guy and Hunter J. Schoen",
        "kicker": "Analysis",
        "prettyDate": "July 18, 2023",
        "timeToRead": "6 minute",
        "image": {
          "uri": "https://images.propertycasualty360.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/414/2023/07/Trial-court-room_Semen-Salivanchuk.jpg",
          "width": "767",
          "height": "633"
        },
        "authors": [
          {
            "webUrl": "/author/profile/matthew-c-guy/",
            "name": "Matthew C. Guy"
          },
          {
            "webUrl": "/author/profile/hunter-j-schoen/",
            "name": "Hunter J. Schoen"
          }
        ],
        "kickerNode": [
          {
            "uri": "/analysis/",
            "sectionName": "Analysis"
          }
        ],
        "summary": "The Texas Supreme Court considered a case and focused on two questions: Who is an insured under the umbrella policy and for what coverage?",
        "body": null
      }
    ]
  }
}