Steven A. Meyerowitz, a Harvard Law School graduate, is the founder and president of Meyerowitz Communications Inc., a law firm marketing communications consulting company. He may be contacted at [email protected].
A Texas court has remanded a case brought by an insured against its insurance company and adjuster on diversity grounds even though the insurer elected to take responsibility for the adjuster.
A “faulty work” exclusion in an insurance policy precluded coverage of damage to a church's pipe organ that allegedly had been caused by a person hired to perform maintenance on the organ.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has ruled that an insurer had no duty to cover a class action settlement of a lawsuit alleging that its insured had sent hundreds of thousands of junk faxes – even if it had done so on the mistaken belief that the recipients had agreed to receive them.
A federal district has ruled that an exclusion in a commercial general liability insurance policy precluded coverage of a lawsuit alleging that the insured company had violated its fiduciary duties under ERISA.
A federal district court in New Mexico has decided that an uninsured motorist insurance policy and New Mexico's uninsured motorist law did not cover theft of an insured's vehicle.
Resolving a “long-deferred issue,” the Supreme Court of Rhode Island has ruled that a third party could not bring an action against an insurance company without having first obtained judgment against its insured.
New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy has signed legislation relating to the insurance coverage of mental health and substance use disorder treatment services for state residents.
This is a case in which a Michigan court decided that insureds were estopped from claiming that missing jewelry was worth $44,600 because the same jewelry in bankruptcy was valued at $1,000.
First Liberty Ins. Corp. v. McGeehanA federal district court in Pennsylvania has ruled that an insurance company did not owe coverage to a couple injured…
A California court has ruled that a claimant had the burden of demonstrating that the pilot of a Cessna aircraft that crashed had completed an annual training requirement as required by the pilot's insurance policy.
Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts
Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.
FC&S Coverage Insider helps you stay on top of what's happening in the industry, bringing you the latest risk and coverage analyses, discussions, and more.