The claimants' attorneys' formation of the Coalition of Abused Scouts for Justice, the insurers argue, was a way of taking control of the case.

Several questions centered on policy language barring coverage for claims that are "the same as or related to" each other, not necessarily identical.

Two Ohio counties that are seeking purely economic damages in the case didn't prove what costs were incurred by those who treated individuals affected by opioid use, Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz Jr. concluded.

Superior Court Judge Eric M. Davis applied a broader definition of the insurance contract term "securities claim" that required coverage in a case over a challenge to a corporate spinoff and merger that was funded by debt instruments.