The justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that a change in vehicles covered by an auto policy does not equate a "purchase" entitling the policyholders to another opportunity to waive UM/UIM stacking.
A unanimous Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that removing a vehicle from an auto policy does not create another opportunity to waive stacking for UM/UIM coverage.
Another federal court has rejected the argument that the COVID-19 pandemic caused "direct physical loss or damage" to an insured's business. This decision is the latest in a series of cases where judges have come to similar conclusions.
The Philadelphia 76ers and the owner of its training complex are seeking declaratory judgment to reflect that COVID-19 "does not constitute direct physical loss or damage" to their property.
FC&S Coverage Insider helps you stay on top of what's happening in the industry, bringing you the latest risk and coverage analyses, discussions, and more.