An insurer’s continued acceptance of premium payments from an insured after denying that insured’s claim for noncompliance was not a waiver. The case is Sinjel, L.L.C. v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 20778 (5th Cir. 2024). Please note that this opinion is unpublished and therefore has limited precedential value.
What Happened
Sinjel, L.L.C. purchased a commercial property with hopes of renovating the building on the property. In order to protect their future investment, Sinjel procured insurance from Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. The policy included builder’s risk provisions as a safety measure against loss while the renovations were ongoing. The scope of the policy, however, “limited coverage to a vacant ‘existing building’ for 60 consecutive days from the inception date of this policy unless building permits have been obtained and rehabilitation or renovation work has begun on the 'existing building’” (emphasis added). According to the policy, an “existing building” meant “a building or structure that was constructed and standing prior to the inception of this policy and that [would]l undergo renovation or rehabilitation.”
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]