Our insured was involved in an auto accident where the other party was at fault. Our insured did not carry collision coverage on his auto. It was necessary for him to rent a car and purchase collision coverage from the car rental company. The other party's insurer is refusing to pay for the rental car insurance, calling this an undue enrichment for our insured. We see the insurance as a reasonable and necessary expense that should be paid for since the accident was the result of another driver's negligence. What is your opinion?
California Subscriber
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]