September 16, 2013
We would like your opinion as to which carrier would be primary/excess or if they should share. The plaintiff alleges that she slipped and fell on an accumulation of ice and snow while she was walking to the parking lot. All snow removal is done in house, no outside companies. Our policy covers the management company directly; the owner is not an additional insured under our policy. On the other hand, our insured as the property manager is insured under the owner's policy, so he has coverage under both policies.
The insurance carrier for the owner of the property has taken the position that our insured (the property manager) is an insured under its policy, but the carrier points out the policy conditions which it believes clearly states that its policy is excess to ours. We disagree. Based on a review of the two insurance policies, we believe that the owner's coverage should be primary.
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]